No regulator checks your photos — the insurer does
The insurer wants proof of the last cleaning and the crew quit.
Your guys did the job right. The before and after photos are on a phone that walked out the door in March, the sticker in the hood is smudged past reading, and the restaurant is quietly shopping the contract.
No regulator requires this. That is the honest version — this is a revenue tool, not a compliance tool.
01 / The inspection
Tap through it the way a crew lead would.
8 items, about forty seconds. Mark one as a fail and watch what the Hood record does.
Area flagged as inaccessible
An unreachable duct section gets recorded with a photo and a reason instead of being quietly left off the report. That line is what protects you when a fire marshal finds grease in a run nobody could physically get to.
02 / The record log
“Prove the cook line hood was cleaned the quarter before the fire.”
Every finished inspection lands here, searchable by Hood, Crew lead, record number or date. Try HD-2.
03 / What it would cost
One price. No per-seat math.
- —Before and after photos attach to the hood, not to a crew member's phone
- —An inaccessible section is recorded with a reason instead of omitted
- —Cleaning history per hood survives the crew that did the work
- —Search by hood, restaurant, crew lead or date
- —Export a quarter as one PDF the insurer or fire marshal accepts
- —Works in a kitchen basement with no signal
- —Next service date tracked per hood by cooking volume
This page is the prototype. If the workflow above is close to yours, tell me what is wrong with it and I will change it before you pay anything.
Email me what is wrong with it